Subhash B. from Calcutta, India asks:
Tudor Heritage Chronograph Blue --- Great watch, great brand, great value proposition ... but what kind of intrigues me is the fact that some people who be trying to sell their Tudors (including this new Blue Heritage) online thru eBay or other sites always rely and underscore - ROLEX - MADE BY ROLEX - ROLEX QUALITY - etc .... Cannot Tudor hold a good resale value without having to remind prospective buyers about their Rolex heritage? Does that mean that Tudor is still not strong enough to hold its own on field amongst the big daddies of the watch world ? It still has to look upto big brother ROLEX to hold its hand to make it sell ? Then why not simply go buy a ROLEX than a Tudor when you know ultimately its the ROLEX heritage and build quality that's gonna hold sway ....
For those that don't know, Tudor is a sub-brand of Rolex that uses Swiss ETA movements versus in-house made Rolex movements. Of course, Tudor makes their own watches with unique designs compared to the Rolex models, but that is the principle difference and why Tudor watches are by and large less expensive. However, it is true that Rolex and Tudor components are made for the most part by the same people using (more than likely) a lot of the same machines.
In places like the US, Tudor has been absent for a long time, but in September of 2013 Tudor is making a comeback to the USA. Without a brand identity, it makes a lot of sense for them to extract as much value as possible out of their relationship with Rolex, given Rolex's very high status and position in the US. Likewise, around the world, Rolex is typically held in very high regard, so any association with Rolex is something that at least, on a salesperson-to-consumer basis, would likely be communicated as a positive feature.
Having said that, you aren't likely to see any official Tudor advertising discussing their relationship with Rolex. The brand is more and more trying to stand on its own as a more entry-level luxury watch, rather than act in concert or as a stepping stone to a Rolex watch. The two brands are more and more trying to live side-by-side as opposed to Tudor being a "cheaper alternative to Rolex that is pretty much as good."
Tudor strictly doesn't need to discuss their relationship with Rolex, but what good would it do salespeople to keep silent on that? It is like if you are running for political office and your brother is the President. You personally might not state that in a speech, but you can be damn sure that everyone speaking on your behalf will. Tudor salespeople discuss the Rolex connection because it helps a larger audience of people appreciate the quality of the watches (which is very good), and because not offering the Rolex relationship detail doesn't do any good.
Is there a risk of losing a Tudor sale to Rolex? Probably not, since Tudor watches are appreciably less expensive and feature totally unique designs at this point in their product history.
We choose a few questions each month or so, and publish them. Want to ask the aBlogtoWatch team a question? We want to hear from you »