Category: MARCH LA.B

Tags: , ,

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review   march la b

Recently I was flipping through GQ magazine's annual "Style Guide." A special issue of their magazine dedicated to helping helpless male souls "dress better" (not that the advice is all bad, but it is extremely declarative and one-dimensional - though I do realize that assertive, aggressively consultative content does sell copies). Thankfully, the issue had a section on watches, but as it turned out the section was written by fashion editors. Uh oh!. Actually, not everything they said was bad, though it left little room for 'argument.' They more or less offered a "one-size-fits-all" approach to recommending watches - which is clearly not in tune with the universe of timepiece options out there. When it came down to it they suggested getting your self a small, thin, gold watch.

'Small' seemed to be an overarching tone in the guide. It was clearly marked for novices. Not once I believe, was the term "movement' mentioned. Why is it that fashion editors in New York are afraid of large watches? They seemed to make one exception for 44mm wide Panerai timepieces, which are clearly not very large by today's standards. Anyhow, looks like the fashion elite edict that small is in. This brings me to the point at hand, my review of the MARCH LA.B AM 1 watch that is 37mm wide. A segment of the watch wearing population seems to be arguing that large it out, some people are yelling "long live the large watch." I don't know why people need to assert the existence or denial of a trend. The only person who should care what the size of your watch is... well, is you. I personally prefer "larger" watches. Not because I think it is 'in,' but because that is what I like. I have always like that. But I have sported smaller pieces in my life, and I don't have a problem with it. Can't small and large watches live together in harmony... in one's timepiece collection?

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review   march la b

The AM 1 from newer watch brand MARCH LA.B is not a large watch by any means. The brand will be offering a 40mm wide version of it soon. So consider this review of the 37mm wide size and anything larger than that which might come out soon. I am usually very "generous in tone" with new brands, but I don't need to be with MARCH LA.B. As a new brand they have a lot of things right. Design is very cohesive and well put together. Quality is impressive, and the overall presentation is well thought out.

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review   march la b

I sat down with the brand's co-founder Jerome Jacques Marie Mageto discuss the concept of the brand and the design. The story in interesting. In a nutshell, the founders are from France, and Jerome is the design. They previously worked on eye and watches for Quicksilver. They wanted to team up and do their own watch brand, with Jerome being the design. Jerome, while French, has had a lifelong affinity for American muscle cars (especially the Mustang), and the era which birthed muscle cars. Jerome wanted to design an elegant timepiece that was still masculine and evoked the muscle car era. Something that a well-dressed GTO Judge driver might wear with a leather jacket cira 1969. The AM 1 isn't exactly a "muscle watch," but from a design and thematic standpoint I see the brand's point and position.

The AM 1 is their major model in the MARCH LA.B collection - and it is a stand up design. Retro and still totally unique. Jerome has proved himself to be an adept watch designer. The firm was also able to team up with some stellar Swiss suppliers. Which accounts for the quality of the watches being quite high. Little things that new brands often get wrong are very well done on the AM 1. Examples include the very nicely engineered bracelet as well as pristine dial. Nods to the past are bountiful. Including the style of clasp on the strap as well as the domed sapphire-coated mineral crystal meant to look like an acrylic crystal. The design of the dial itself is totally passable as something spacey from 1967. Case further is water resistant to 100 meters.

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review   march la b

More enjoyable little detains include the design of the crown - which is unique with its textured surface and green logo inlay (a touch more green on the dial periphery). The watch case is a very fluid design with good contrast polish and an enjoyable shape. Also note the very cool looking engraving on the back of the case that is a top with watch gears inside of it. This is one of the neatest pictographic watch logos I have seen in a while.

The standard AM 1 has a Swiss Ronda 517 quartz movement in it, but the brand does offer some version with mechanical movements. More mechanical movements to come in the future as I understand. While it is another topic all together MARCH LA.B has a special relationship with Carroll Shelby, and will offer a limited edition 40mm wide special version of the AM 1 with a automatic mechanical movement that I discuss here. The Ronda 517 is a nice three hand with day/date movement. MARCH LA.B uses custom discs for the day and date with a special font - another nice detail.

The designer has really proved himself here. Not just in concept, but as well as execution. I have seen plenty of watches that look killer on paper, only to let down in real-life. Jerome Mage being a man with an eye for style and detail, wearing a watch like this is as much about the design, as it is buying into the talent of Mr. Mage. Ideally he has the power to cast spells with a name like that.

MARCH LA.B AM 1 Watch Review   march la b

The gap-less steel bracelet that is great looking and comfortable is really a selling point of the AM 1 - though it is available with leather straps (and in PVD gold for the case). For people who enjoy a 37mm wide watch, the AM 1 is really nice on the wrist and well designed. As I say about many timepieces, even if you don't personally like the piece from an aesthetic standpoint, it is hard to argue that it is not a good execution of what it is meant to be. It also makes for a good ladies' watch for women who enjoy the look of it. With a few different dial colors and styles, as well as various strap options, the AM 1 is well-rounded right out of the bag. Like I said. for those who simply can't pull off a 37mm wide size, a 40mm wide versions should be available soon.

The AM 1 watch comes in a well-designed travel pouch with a green velvet style lining. You can get the entire MARCH LA.B watch collection online via their web store. This specific 37mm AM 1 watch with a steel bracelet and silver dial retains for $1,090, while the entire collection ranges in price from $895 - $1,260.

About Ariel Adams

Owner & Editor-In-Chief of aBlogtoWatch (formerly known as aBlogtoRead.com) - the world's largest and most popular wrist watch blog. Ariel Adams also regularly contributes to other important media such as Forbes, Departures, Centurion, Tech Crunch, and more.

About the Author

, ,

40 comments
ivan
ivan

it does look like a rado, for that price........

Dan
Dan

Ilike this watch, and the look... myfavourite watch is a wind up from my Grandad wore it in the 60's, its a stainless steel Atlantic Worldmaster, 21 Jewels. thanks

Dave
Dave

I really like the designs of this company, but the prices are a joke. I would go with a Mido Commander for a similar aesthetic, better price, and automatic movement.

John
John

Hi, to the comment of 'Bjorn Keizers', completely agree with you! From my perspective and with what little knowledge I have on watches, I have come to realise, in my opinion, a watch driven by a motor is only ever as good as that motor, and once its life ends, bye bye watch, because you then have a case which you can, at a stretch buy a 'movement' and replace the old one for a few pounds. That may be ignorant of me, but having owned several 'battery operated watches in the past, I was surprised at how little a 'movement' was behind the pretty face! John

John
John

Hi, to the comment of 'Bjorn Keizers',
completely agree with you! From my perspective and with what little knowledge I have on watches, I have come to realise, in my opinion, a watch driven by a motor is only ever as good as that motor, and once its life ends, bye bye watch, because you then have a case which you can, at a stretch buy a 'movement' and replace the old one for a few pounds. That may be ignorant of me, but having owned several 'battery operated watches in the past, I was surprised at how little a 'movement' was behind the pretty face!

John

nje
nje

interesting watch but i really think they are pricing themselves out of a lot of potential sales with these pieces. not really seeing anything here that justifies the pricetag. Even the case it comes in looks kind of dinky, maybe i'm just picking.

Richard Stancik
Richard Stancik

My $.02... I love big watches and I hate expanding bracelets. They pull my hair. As always, interesting choice to write about, Ariel!

Richard Stancik
Richard Stancik

My $.02...

I love big watches and I hate expanding bracelets. They pull my hair.

As always, interesting choice to write about, Ariel!

This comment has been deleted

This comment has been deleted

Kris C
Kris C

Geez, I hope not! You those those spiedel disasters and they are either too big and wear like a bangle bracelet, or too small and are expanded all the time and look like trash. I work with a guy that has one on a very nice old Omega his father gave him; just blasphemous. I'm all about people trying again, but please don't re-release whats already been done, lets see a new concept. Oh, and of this AM 1? It's pretty non-confrontational, and would be a good choice for someone that is not a watch junkie and just wanted something he could wear with a suit or jeans. But I'm not that guy, and think that it's mispriced for what it is. I can't seem to locate what mechanical movements they use, or will be using: do we know?

Brandon
Brandon

this watch doesn't look anything more than a watch from the 60's with an expando strap

admin
admin

So which one? It is meant to resemble those pieces without copying them. Doesn't have an expando strap. I wonder if those will ever come back....

Kris C
Kris C

Geez, I hope not! You those those spiedel disasters and they are either too big and wear like a bangle bracelet, or too small and are expanded all the time and look like trash. I work with a guy that has one on a very nice old Omega his father gave him; just blasphemous.

I'm all about people trying again, but please don't re-release whats already been done, lets see a new concept.

Oh, and of this AM 1? It's pretty non-confrontational, and would be a good choice for someone that is not a watch junkie and just wanted something he could wear with a suit or jeans. But I'm not that guy, and think that it's mispriced for what it is. I can't seem to locate what mechanical movements they use, or will be using: do we know?

Ivan Y
Ivan Y

Thanks for bringing us another new and interesting brand, Ariel! The 40mm watches are already available in their e-store -- the price for AM1 40mm Black Auto is $1985. I really like the styling of that auto model (green seconds hand excluded, but I guess green is their signature color); the price -- not so much. But I followed them on Twitter in case they decide to change their mind ;) With regards to sizing, I'd expect GQ (or any other publication that issues a decree) to offer guidance based on wrist size or something like that. P.S. Which PAM did they recommend? Given it's GQ, I'd guess Radiomir?

This comment has been deleted

Ivan Y
Ivan Y

Thanks for bringing us another new and interesting brand, Ariel!

The 40mm watches are already available in their e-store -- the price for AM1 40mm Black Auto is $1985. I really like the styling of that auto model (green seconds hand excluded, but I guess green is their signature color); the price -- not so much. But I followed them on Twitter in case they decide to change their mind ;)

With regards to sizing, I'd expect GQ (or any other publication that issues a decree) to offer guidance based on wrist size or something like that.

P.S. Which PAM did they recommend? Given it's GQ, I'd guess Radiomir?

admin
admin

I think QG liked some basic Luminor Marina... But perhaps it was a Radiomir.

Ivan Y
Ivan Y

Plain-dialed Luminor is what I like best too, but I figured GQ might go for a slicker Radiomir.

rob
rob

what now you are editing all the comments on this blog, if you are going to edit out real ideas and just push crappy watches, I don't want to come back and add value to the discussion.

admin
admin

Rob, What are you talking about? I don't edit out anything. I have to moderate all comments to prevent spam (of which there is a lot). So if you post a comment at 1pm and I don't see it until 4pm, it wouldn't be up until then. So I don't know what you mean.

rob
rob

what now you are editing all the comments on this blog, if you are going to edit out real ideas and just push crappy watches, I don't want to come back and add value to the discussion.

admin
admin

Rob,

What are you talking about? I don't edit out anything. I have to moderate all comments to prevent spam (of which there is a lot). So if you post a comment at 1pm and I don't see it until 4pm, it wouldn't be up until then. So I don't know what you mean.

Ulysses
Ulysses

Very retro - it looks like an old Seiko Bellmatic. Really quite a stylish watch with some heft. The black day/date wheels look great.

Ulysses
Ulysses

Very retro - it looks like an old Seiko Bellmatic. Really quite a stylish watch with some heft. The black day/date wheels look great.

rob
rob

Basically the fashion oracles are trying to dictate what watch you are going to be wearing. It's these people that sit in a room and decide what colors are "in", what patterns etc. They get fabric manufacturers in on there plans, whats possible what's not and then the propaganda gets put into play. Like with what you are seeing here, with the struggling small watch trend. Total BS. What I am not sure of is whether watch manufacturers understand that small and thin equals lower sales. WHY? Because of emotional attachment. How do you get attached to something so small its not even there? WHY not just not wear one, everyone has a cell phone now that has the time, and it is going to be way more accurate than anything you have on your wrist (less atomic watches). It is not like the 80's where you had bragging rights to your small thin gold longines, because now it would be like, "what's the point?" I think watch makers and fashion oracles must start understanding is that this idea of wearing a watch is not functional anymore. Its a jewelery/status piece slash statement. Its about having something mechanical and technical. and they want you to spend more on designer clothes that are out of style in 2yrs regardless of how well they are made. This is the same people that started in on the whole "luxury is disposable" idea, true luxury is not caring if your 30k watch looks good after 6 months because I will throw it out and buy a new one. Remember pre bust, the rubber bezels on watches? Alacantra on cars? Matte paint finish on cars? Now it's like I want value, uniqueness, and quality manufacturing that lasts. ETA movement in 5k watches, that's out. Catalog cases, forget it. Rubber strap for a 10k watch? Get lost. Who would by a thin small gold Breitling? No one. Because the alternative is better, don't wear one at all.

Ivan Y
Ivan Y

Dude, chill. Magazine recommendations or "expert" opinions aren't mandatory :) Like Ariel mentioned, doing one-size-fits-all approach probably wasn't right but it's GQ's prerogative... and, thankfully, we don't need to follow it. I think, seeing the GQ's guide might change opinion -- odds are they were just reacting to blingy/gaudy/in-your-face hunking watches and called for a restraint that simpler watches can provide. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't buy a tasteful diver/chrono or whatever. Lastly, there are watch houses that make pretty damn cool thin watches (and they are starting to upsize them too). Many people like a chunky piece of steel on their wrist, but there's something marvelous about a movement that's a couple of millimeters thick and packed together tighter than a Japanese subway in rush hour!

rob
rob

Basically the fashion oracles are trying to dictate what watch you are going to be wearing.
It's these people that sit in a room and decide what colors are "in", what patterns etc. They get fabric manufacturers in on there plans, whats possible what's not and then the propaganda gets put into play. Like with what you are seeing here, with the struggling small watch trend. Total BS.

What I am not sure of is whether watch manufacturers understand that small and thin equals lower sales. WHY? Because of emotional attachment. How do you get attached to something so small its not even there? WHY not just not wear one, everyone has a cell phone now that has the time, and it is going to be way more accurate than anything you have on your wrist (less atomic watches). It is not like the 80's where you had bragging rights to your small thin gold longines, because now it would be like, "what's the point?"

I think watch makers and fashion oracles must start understanding is that this idea of wearing a watch is not functional anymore. Its a jewelery/status piece slash statement. Its about having something mechanical and technical. and they want you to spend more on designer clothes that are out of style in 2yrs regardless of how well they are made. This is the same people that started in on the whole "luxury is disposable" idea, true luxury is not caring if your 30k watch looks good after 6 months because I will throw it out and buy a new one. Remember pre bust, the rubber bezels on watches? Alacantra on cars? Matte paint finish on cars?

Now it's like I want value, uniqueness, and quality manufacturing that lasts. ETA movement in 5k watches, that's out. Catalog cases, forget it. Rubber strap for a 10k watch? Get lost.

Who would by a thin small gold Breitling? No one. Because the alternative is better, don't wear one at all.

Ivan Y
Ivan Y

Dude, chill. Magazine recommendations or "expert" opinions aren't mandatory :) Like Ariel mentioned, doing one-size-fits-all approach probably wasn't right but it's GQ's prerogative... and, thankfully, we don't need to follow it.

I think, seeing the GQ's guide might change opinion -- odds are they were just reacting to blingy/gaudy/in-your-face hunking watches and called for a restraint that simpler watches can provide. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't buy a tasteful diver/chrono or whatever.

Lastly, there are watch houses that make pretty damn cool thin watches (and they are starting to upsize them too). Many people like a chunky piece of steel on their wrist, but there's something marvelous about a movement that's a couple of millimeters thick and packed together tighter than a Japanese subway in rush hour!

admin
admin

Interesting points Rob. Thanks for the thoughts.

rob
rob

And a thousand bucks for a thin small non-gold quartz watch? that's out.

Jay
Jay

The two-tone steel looks fantastic! I'm a new reader to your blog btw, you kept me up all night dammit! jk, great site sir!

dshon
dshon

Ariel, Since my first two comments on your blog were so critical, I wanted to take a moment to let you know that reviews of watches like the AM 1 above is exactly why I enjoy your blog so much. The AM 1 would probably be dismissed as a "fashion watch" on most other watch sites, but I share your appreciation for it. It might not offer an interesting movement, but the design, construction and finishing of the case, dial and bracelet look very impressive. Thanks.

dshon
dshon

Ariel,

Since my first two comments on your blog were so critical, I wanted to take a moment to let you know that reviews of watches like the AM 1 above is exactly why I enjoy your blog so much. The AM 1 would probably be dismissed as a "fashion watch" on most other watch sites, but I share your appreciation for it. It might not offer an interesting movement, but the design, construction and finishing of the case, dial and bracelet look very impressive.

Thanks.

admin
admin

Great, glad you like it.

Larry D.
Larry D.

Sorry...I've been to the dark side...and I'm not going back!!!! I'll stick with my 48mm plus watches.....and pick up a mess of bargins on ebay as the larger watch get dumped there for pennies on the dollar!!!

Larry D.
Larry D.

Sorry...I've been to the dark side...and I'm not going back!!!! I'll stick with my 48mm plus watches.....and pick up a mess of bargins on ebay as the larger watch get dumped there for pennies on the dollar!!!

admin
admin

Amen to that!

Bjorn Keizers
Bjorn Keizers

I was mostly talking about the overall theme, but if you were to put this next to the DiaStar 'The Original', they would definitely feel similar. Both watches have a slight sunburst effect on the dial, both have chromed day/date windows, the hand design feels similar, the case shape around the crystal, and the case looks flared, but not as much as the larger DiaStar. Just my opinion... but I think they are very similar.

Bjorn Keizers
Bjorn Keizers

I was mostly talking about the overall theme, but if you were to put this next to the DiaStar 'The Original', they would definitely feel similar.

Both watches have a slight sunburst effect on the dial, both have chromed day/date windows, the hand design feels similar, the case shape around the crystal, and the case looks flared, but not as much as the larger DiaStar.

Just my opinion... but I think they are very similar.

Bjorn Keizers
Bjorn Keizers

$1090? Yowza, at that price... I'd opt for a Rado DiaStar instead. The watch looks nice enough, but a DiaStar would also fit the 'retro yet modern' look, and offers an automatic movement at this price, as opposed to Ronda Quartz. (Not that that's necessarily bad, but it is a collector preference...) The Tungsten case is also more unique as is the faceted crystal. I like the dial design; clean and simple. But again, the DiaStar has lumed, colorful markers for an interesting contrast. Basically, I'm having a hard time finding the unique selling point of this watch.

Bjorn Keizers
Bjorn Keizers

$1090? Yowza, at that price... I'd opt for a Rado DiaStar instead.

The watch looks nice enough, but a DiaStar would also fit the 'retro yet modern' look, and offers an automatic movement at this price, as opposed to Ronda Quartz. (Not that that's necessarily bad, but it is a collector preference...) The Tungsten case is also more unique as is the faceted crystal.

I like the dial design; clean and simple. But again, the DiaStar has lumed, colorful markers for an interesting contrast.

Basically, I'm having a hard time finding the unique selling point of this watch.

admin
admin

Not really sure that I see a lot of visual similarities with this and the Diastar - but certainly thematically the same. I prefer the style of the March LA.B watch. That model Rado is too curvy for me.

Trackbacks

  1. [...] crown. This model features a Swiss ETA 2892 automatic movement, but you can check out a previous review I did of a smaller version of the AM1 with a quartz movement here. Price for the MARCH LA.B AM1 40 Black Automatic watch is $2,295 and you can enter for a chance to [...]

  2. [...] attracted me to MARCH LA.B when I first wrote about them (here) was the interesting polished designs and the quality the watches had even though it was their first [...]