back to top

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

We’ve been waiting to get our hands on the Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel watch since we first heard about it. For those not caught up about this piece, Montblanc is offering a quality, good-looking, high-complication watch for a fraction of the price that other annual calendar watches go for. Personally, I’m always skeptical when I hear about “affordable alternatives” to most things (not exclusive to watches), but Montblanc has successfully realized where to save costs and where not to in the creation of this piece. In short, Montblanc has hit a home run, and I’m now following a brand I’ve always liked closer than I ever have.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

You’re going to have to go into looking at this watch comfortable with the idea that you’re never going to have it all. Well, you could have it all, but you’d have to spend a whole lot more money to get it. Montblanc is doing something they have previously done with watches like the Montblanc Meisterstuck Heritage Perpetual Calendar (hands-on here), in modifying a base caliber Sellita movement. Here, they have modified a base Sellita SW-300 caliber, operating at 4Hz, with a module that tacks on parts of the chronograph and, naturally, the annual calendar. The result is a perfectly competent and nice-looking movement, the Calibre MB 25.09. More importantly, it successfully pulls off an annual calendar complication.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

At this point, in-house snobs will turn their nose up, but for all intents and purposes, this movement fits the bill for what Montblanc is trying to accomplish. Unfortunately, with a high complication like an annual calendar, the remonstrances are sure to be loud. I, however, do have to echo a complaint of David Bredan’s from the article linked to above: the 42-hour power reserve from the base movement is now burdened with carrying ten hands, which is really less than ideal. I don’t think there was much of a choice here, but it is worth mentioning.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Moving on to the dial, there is a lot to love about the legibility of the Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel watch, but there’s also a bit to not love. Montblanc has managed to fit a lot on the dial without making it look cluttered or too busy. In fact, the clean lines and minimal, but meaningful, use of color looks just great. The use of blue to distinguish chronograph functions is a wonderful move and one that actually makes sense past being an aesthetic flair. Considering how small the sub-dials are, I appreciate the thoughtfulness from Montblanc here. The silverish dial with sunburst pattern contrasted with the guilloche on the sub-dials provides a nice vibrance while retaining the simple, elegant look of the watch.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Something I’ve heard complaints about but am willing to personally overlook is the moon phase subdial at 3 o’clock. It’s not the best-looking moon phase I’ve seen (not even close), but I think it’s a uniquely executed take on the complication that I would much prefer to an even slightly dinky-looking rotating moon phase disc. It’s difficult to endorse the use of pushers to adjust the calendar functions, but it’s important to keep in mind the issue of choosing what battles to pick in creating a quality, but relatively affordable annual calendar watch.


Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

The Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel watch is 42mm wide and sits 13.83mm high on the wrist. It’s not a small watch by any means, but I think the dimensions are about what I would expect. A little lower on the wrist would be nice, but the height is far from egregious as-is. The watch comes on a black alligator-skin strap made in the Montblanc Pelletteria in Florence. It’s also got a nice steel or 18k red gold pin buckle.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Montblanc puts this watch through the Montblanc Laboratory 500 Test, which is a 500-hour test designed to simulate a variety of scenarios it’s likely to experience through its lifetime. It’s presumably not as rigorous as the one performed by Jaeger-LeCoultre – where Montblanc’s current head Jerome Lambert used to serve as CEO – which is a 1,000-hour test. Then again, they’re halfway there.

Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel Watch Hands-On Hands-On

It may have seemed that I have focused a bit too much on the relative “negatives” of this watch, but it’s because I want it to be clear that I’m not saying that it’s perfect and a steal at the price. It’s got flaws, like most things do. However, the balance struck between quality, compromise, and price is in perfect harmony, and the Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel watch is a resounding success for the brand. I’d also ask naysayers to keep in mind that this watch is not the end result, but rather a step forward for both Montblanc and for watch enthusiasts who truly enjoy a complication like the annual calendar, regardless of their current station in life. Price for the Montblanc Heritage Chronométrie Chronograph Quantième Annuel in steel (Ref. 114875) is €9,500 and in red gold (Ref. 114876) is €18,900.



Disqus Debug thread_id: 4509635098

  • IanE

    Nice price; boring-looking movement, case and dial and the pushers just make it look like a pretend Chinese chronograph. The compromises don’t work for me (shame!).

  • iamcalledryan

    That price for a very handsome annual is pretty darn good. The Omega DeVille is still a fraction cheaper, but this one is a little more on the dressy side and has the moon phase to boot.

  • I prefer the non-chronograph version below. It just looks more finished and, I don’t know, less like it’s trying too hard to jam everything into one case. It’s also half the price. Is a chronograph complication worth $5000?

    • iamcalledryan

      Actually, yes when you are adding it to an annual calendar and moon phase. The value of this is not the standalone sum of each complication, but the escalating value of integrating them.

      The more appropriate question is: Is a chronograph with moon phase and annual calendar worth 10k?

  • Raymond Wilkie

    Awfully clustered and pointy.

  • Marius

    In my opinion, the whole point of buying a complicated watch is to get a high-quality case and movement. Most complicated watches are expensive precisely because creating and manufacturing a top grade movement is cost and time consuming. There are no shortcuts.

    This watch has an elegant case and dial, but the Selitta movement won`t fool anyone. Unfortunately, there is no budget, or cheap way to get a complicated watch with a high quality caliber. For me, either save up and get a complicated watch with a proper movement from brands like Breguet, Moser, Lange, etc., or use the €9,500 to buy a less complicated watch from IWC, Blancpain, Glashutte Original, etc.

  • Lawrence

    Ewwwww Montblanc… Same Ewwwww to Tiffany and Swarovski watches. They need to stick to what they do best.

    • Boogur T. Wang

      Good point.
      Would that be writing instruments, leather goods, “accessories”, refills, eyewear or fragrances?

  • funNactive

    Excellent price for the complications. I want a triple calendar watch (wouldn’t mind manually adjusting when needed) – an annual colander is even better. The design is a little off from my personal taste though. I like more of a traditional moon phase & I lean more towards a classic easy to read styling (ex. Jaeger-LeCoultre Master Calendar Meteorite )

  • Boogur T. Wang

    I admire what Montblanc has moved towards. They have decided to enter a crowded field and are using a “flood the sku” approach. Thankfully, under competent guidance, they are offering some quality as they do this.
    In seeing this offering I am immediately hit with “My G-D, too much info!.” Its seems to be just too info rich for actual real world consideration.
    I suppose, if one is tired of, or distracted, from constant naval gazing this would be an excuse to shift to ones wrist. But really, this just seems to much to be a real world consideration.
    Sussing out the time should be an easy thing. A glance and it’s done. The date could also be obtained with ease. Beyond that, it just becomes silly. IMO. (I do like an occasional power reserve indicator – it does prove helpful if done in a convenient method)

    When a piece approaches the level of information that this one tries to provide, I think, and it’s merely my opinion, the piece moves into the realm of something other than a ‘time piece.’ It just becomes too much of a complication (pun intended) to daily existence.

  • Ulysses31

    Symmetrical and attractive, with a cool-looking “button” moonphase. I’ve never been a fan of watches that present too much information, but if you’re the type that needs all that, this would be a stylish option.

  • PleaseSpellRoman4AsIV

    Will I buy it? No. Am I happy that they are providing this combination of complications at a relatively affordable price point? Hell Yeah!

  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: jpg, png.