Category: Omega

Tags: ,

Vintage Omega Megasonic Versus Megaquartz Watches

Sponsored Post

Vintage Omega Megasonic Versus Megaquartz Watches   omega

1973 was the year that Omega’s marketing department realized that the brand name contained the word ‘Mega’. The Basel fair of that year saw the launch of both the ‘Megasonic’ and the ‘Megaquartz’- an example of each watch is pictured above.

The MegaSonic 720Hz is a movement unique to Omega and at the time had the smoothest moving second hand, ever. It was designed by Max Hetzel, the creator of the first ‘Tuning fork’ watch (the Bulova Accutron) but it works in a very different way. It has a micro-motor which, in simple terms, is a 1.2mm ruby disc studded with magnets which is shaken between two ruby springs in a sealed, oil-filled box by the tuning fork. This causes the disc to rotate four times per second. This disc is not directly connected to the gear train or any part of the watch but rather uses magnetic gearing to pass on its motion as does some of the reduction gear train.

This is wonderfully mad way to build a watch movement and shows the lengths to which watch brands would go to embrace new technology. An illustration of how the movement works is shown in the clip below.

This staggering ingenuity was soon superseded by the watch launched alongside it – the Megaquartz. This was Omega’s first in-house analogue quartz movement, developed as an alternative to the expensive Beta 21 collaborative effort. It was created in modular form to allow the easy replacement of parts.

You have to wonder at the simultaneous launch of these two watches, one to be a gloriously innovative dead-end and the other to be the first wave of a horological revolution.

The Omega Megaquartz is offered in Fellows’ 21st January Vintage & Modern Wristwatches auction as Lot 120, estimate £300 - £400

The Omega Megasonic is offered in Fellows’ 21st January Vintage & Modern Wristwatches auction as Lot 143, estimate £100 - £150

About SponsoredPost

About the Author

,

8 comments
DG Cayse
DG Cayse

Good solid designs. IMO, either would serve well on the wrist today.

DG Cayse
DG Cayse

Good slid designs. I think either would look well on the wrist today.

MarkCarson
MarkCarson

Interesting that one of them (the MegaQuartz?) looks a bit like the Patek Nautilus (which came out 3 years later in 1976). Makes me wonder if Gerald Genta had a hand in the design of the Omega or not.

MarkCarson
MarkCarson

Interesting that one of them (the MegaQuartz?) looks a bit like the Patek Nautilus (which came out a year later in 1976). Makes me wonder if Gerald Genta had a hand in the of the Omega design or not.

Sergio Magos
Sergio Magos

I had a vintage Seiko diver, which was given to me as a gift from an old friend. A couple years later a passed on to my father and he loves that watch. He wears it everyday. I would love to have this Vintage Omega; it looks great and has great size to it. I had a Seamaster quarts because that was all I could afford but I had to sell to the watch to a friend. My dog needed a serious operation; the money help with the operation. If I could afford to, this would be an Omega I would purchase. Thank you Omega, for a chance to own what I consider the best watches!!

DG Cayse
DG Cayse

@Sergio Magos I have always liked the Seamaster quartz model. Good solid watch. Well made and durable.

However, as time has gone by I have come to appreciate the smoother seconds hand movement of  the better mechanical movements. Sweeping movement vs. tick-tick-ticking movements. Funny, the ticking used to be OK - now I want the sweeping.

This comment has been deleted

Ulysses31
Ulysses31

Love the vintage designs.  Wouldn't mind owning either one.  A shame that innovation in electronic watch movements is almost dead in the Swiss watch industry now.