Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches pg. 2

Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches

Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches ABTW Editors' Lists

The Shock Resistant Watch

Legend has it that during a party, Breguet, with an eye for theatrical publicity and intending to draw attention to his new watch, created a stir by dropping it on the floor. In Breguet's time this would usually mean a broken watch, but it featured the "parachute" shock resistance that he'd been working on and he demonstrated how it was able to still function thanks to his new mechanism.

Due to the inherently fragile nature and exact tolerances of mechanical watches, physical shocks are probably its greatest enemy. The balance assembly being the most vulnerable part. Your mechanical watch might be able to withstand all manner of other abuses but drop it on the bathroom floor and you could be looking at an expensive repair bill.

These days there is even an ISO standard for wristwatch shock resistance but it wasn't until the 1920's and 30's that shock resistance mechanisms in wristwatches were developed. One of the first and best known is the Incabloc system which in essence is very similar to Breguet's solution. Other ways to combat shock were also developed. Wyler Geneve in the 1920's, brought out its Incaflex balance wheel which was protected along its diameter by two curved elastic arms to absorb any shocks.

Wyler watches gained a reputation for toughness and they devised publicity stunts involving tall iconic buildings to enhance this reputation. In 1956 two Wyler Incaflex timepieces were dropped 300 meters from the Eiffel tower and shown to be fully functional. Likewise in 1962, six watches were dropped from the Seattle Tower with the same result.

Incabloc's system though remained the most common. But shock resistance in wristwatches took a while to become universally implemented and well into the 1950's broken balance staffs were one of the most common causes of mechanical failure. Incabloc's patent failed to protect its design and many other similar systems were developed. Well known ones being the "Kif" system used by many and Seiko's "Diashoc" and Citizens "Parashoc" systems.

Rolex have since developed their Paraflex system which they say has a 50 percent greater resistance to shocks as well as developing a hairspring made from niobium, zirconium and oxygen alloy with 10x more shock resistance than 'traditional' springs. Swatch also developed something called ‘Nivachoc’ which is said to reposition more precisely after a shock and first came to notice when it was used by Breguet in 2006.

One of the most recent developments in shock resistance came in 2007 with Ulysse Nardin's "Innovision" watch, in which the elasticity and superior dry friction properties of silicon were used to create a new shock absorbing system.

Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches ABTW Editors' Lists

The Self-Winding "Automatic" Watch

It was in 1770 that Perrelet invented the first self-winding mechanism but it wasn't until 1923 when British watchmaker John Harwood took out a patent for his invention of the self-winding mechanism for the wristwatch.

Using a semicircular weight that rotated 300 degrees and ran into a spring bumper which the wearer could feel, it was known as the "bumper" design. The watch would run for only 12 hours when fully wound and the time was set using the bezel since it didn't have a traditional stem winder. With financial backing he went on to produce many thousands of watches based around his new mechanism but unfortunately due to the British economic depression of the 1920's and 30's, went bust and the Harwood company folded in 1931 allowing other companies to use the design.

Head of research and development at the Rolex Bienne factory, Emile Borer, further developed Harwood's design and used it as the basis for the Rolex caliber 620 Oyster Perpetual. Modifications were made so that the rotor could rotate a full 360 degrees in both directions. This not only increased the energy stored in the mainspring so that it would run 35 hours, but also made it feel better to wear. The result in 1931 was the first really practical and long lasting self-winding wristwatch the "Rolex Oyster Perpetual" a watch model we are all now very familiar with.

The benefit of combining the Oyster case with the newly developed automatic movement was that now the watch didn't need winding every day and the crown was only used to set the time, which meant the crown's waterproof sealing was rarely disturbed and it was also less likely that the owner would forget to screw it down.

In 1935 Sir Malcolm Campbell wore the Oyster Perpetual at a speed of 300mph while breaking the world land speed record, "Rolex watch worn yesterday during driving record attempt and still going splendidly notwithstanding rough usage received." he wrote. Indeed. Campbell became Rolex's first endorsement from a major male sports figure.

Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches ABTW Editors' Lists

The Navigational Watch

In 1919, three planes attempted to fly from Newfoundland to London, only one of them made it. It was after witnessing this tragedy that one of the fathers of modern navigation, Captain Philip Weems of the U.S. Navy, was driven to improve methods of flight navigation.

It was not possible to use the same methods employed by seafarers so Weems set about devising new tools and navigational techniques.

Chronometric precision was rare back then but accurate time reading was crucial because with the high speeds and long distances involved, to be off by even just a few seconds, could prove catastrophic.

To solve this problem Weems came up with an ingenious solution: the Second Setting Watch. Since no watch could adjust the seconds hand to the dial, Weems solution was to adjust the dial to the seconds hand. To achieve this he created a movable dial marked with 60 second increments and consequently enabled a navigator to read truly accurate time.

The second part of what was to become the "Weems System of Navigation", was the invention of a modified sextant to be used when the horizon wasn't visible. Aviators in the 1920's and 30's were now able to navigate with much greater accuracy and fly with less risk by using Weems system.

Top 10 Technically Important Mechanical Wrist Watches ABTW Editors' Lists

It was Longines' involvement in aviation -  they were official timers for the first solo flight across the Atlantic in 1927 -  that was to lead to a partnership with famous aviator Charles Lindbergh to create the Hour Angle watch, a derivation of the Weems watch.

Lindbergh wanted to push Weems' idea of a navigational watch still further. He was concerned about the problem of determining the plane's bearings during flight and put forward the idea of a watch that also gave you the 'hour angle' in degrees and minutes, enabling you to calculate longitude. Lindbergh was so convinced his idea would be a valuable aid to pilots that he even provided sketches to Longines. Longines were enthusiastic and a patent was filed in October 1931 for the Longines Hour Angle with rotating bezel.

The first version used a hand-wound pocket watch movement and had an extra long leather strap so it could be worn over thick flight jackets, and an extra large crown for winding it with gloves on. In 1938 Longines released a second improved version. Following its introduction, and up until the intervention of WWII, the Lindbergh design performed an important role in the setting of a number of new aviation world records.

The Weems Second Setting Watch and the Lindbergh Angle Hour Watch are both milestones in the development of pilot's watches as well as being important navigational aids up until they were made obsolete by electronic navigational equipment. Longines produces authentic recreations of both these watches.

  • Ulysses31

    Some gorgeous watches featured here.  That Longines chrono and the first couple of Rolex models, as well as that wonderful Omega DeVille.  If Rolex still made stuff like that i’d be a customer; a shame they went in the direction they did.  So uh, should we expect the “Top Ten Significant Electronic Watches” list any time soon?

    • Ulysses31 maybe… we are still putting the list together. Anything we may forget? A lot of Seikos on that one…

      • Ulysses31

        aBlogtoWatch Ulysses31 There are too many, makes it hard to choose.  I’ll pick one at random ; the Seiko Thermic.

    • Panagiotis

      Ulysses31 I second that! A list with Astrons, Aerospaces, Bulovas, Campanolas… mouth watering!!!

  • Oelholm

    What a great read. Thanks a lot!

  • AlbertoPerez

    Nice reading.Thanks,it looks Rolex and Longines lovers have a lot to be proud.

  • TimelyOne

    This was a great read….thank you very much!

  • Kris C

    Good read, but coming off the heels of a top 20 list, it is a bit strained. I can only take so much ranking, its just so subjective.

  • JaimeSilvera

    Great article!

  • zaki2004

    Wonderful article! Affirms that Rolex is more than just a watch non-watch people know and love to own.  It is the real article.

  • makemineaglock

    Swiss loving fool! One Seiko! You clearly have little understanding on the mechanics of a watch. Do some homework Matt.

    • makemineaglock  I had had no bias in writing this, it just so happens that in terms of mechanical wristwatch innovations most of them are Swiss. Sorry if you dont like that but thats the way it is. Just as a similar list on Quartz/Electronic watch innovations you would find a lot of Japanese watches on it.

  • Evosam

    A great article and as much as many people hate to bash on Rolex, I think it’s important to mention the Rolex GMT in the  “Navigational Watch” section as one of the icons for multi-time zone measurement.


  • aleximd2000

    Please do not write that the article is this or that, if you are so clever write yourself a better one.That’s for Matt. I think the article should be grouped like this: manual automatic, waterproof , shockproof,  chronograph manual and automatic, antimagnetic, steel and the new alloys , quartz and electroquartz and springdrive. Something like that.
    And about Seiko: it is very interesting why this big player is knowingly forgotten in any classification. Just look in Uhren Exclusive it is not in the top 40 of all. Beside the revenge of the quartz war , try to forget that and focus on what’s important .I my opinion Seiko’s big mistake is that they are making low and high end watches under the same umbrella, not like Swatch which is making cheap  watches and very expensive ones under different names. So one cannot choose wrongly between a swatch and a Breguet for example but can be put in front of a difficult task to choose between a sping drive and a seiko 5.Of course a novice. But the image is that.
    Thanks for the patience luv

  • DG Cayse

    A well-presented overview of significant innovations in the watch world. This piece will, no doubt, be used as a reference guide in the future.
    Particularly nice are the accompanying dates, personages and companies along with excellent photos of the significant watches mentioned.
    Good job Mr. Boston.

  • IsmaelMartinez

    What would this article include in 3 years. I-Watch, Glyde and others. Who knows. Great piece. Thanks.

  • Thanks very much to all those leaving positive comments, glad you enjoyed reading it as it was a bit of work to put together. Interesting hearing your thoughts too.

  • Pingback: BEST FROM: aBlogtoWatch & Friends July 5th | A BLOG TO WATCH()

  • Pingback: Help Me Decide Which Iconic Diver - Page 7()

  • Pingback: Episode 140 – The Return of the Show | Hourtime | The Podcast For Watch Geeks By Watch Geeks()

  • Pingback: Episode 140 – The Return of the Show | Hourtime | The Podcast For Watch Geeks By Watch Geeks()

  • Pingback: Episode 142 – GP MU in NYC | Hourtime | The Podcast For Watch Geeks By Watch Geeks()

  • RaoMak1

    An amazing article and a must must read, I have not only learned, amazed, blown away, fascinated but also fallen in love with many of the watches, specially the IWC’s Da Vinci.
    A job very well done and much appreciated.

  • RaoMak1 Thanks very much for the kind words, pleased to hear that.

  • Biffo10

    I fail to see how Rolex’s creation of a self-winding movement solved
    the problem of dust & water ingress into the case. Whether it is manual
    wind or automatic, the crown still has to be pressed home to ensure the
    integrity of the hermetically sealed Oyster case.  And to liken the said case
    to a real living oyster on the basis of the creature being 100% sealed tight, is

  • Biffo10  Thats right it didnt solve it – that wasnt stated in the article, it just helped prevent dust & water entering through the crown. An automatic movement doesnt need winding therefore the only time you would need to use the crown is for setting the watch, the less you use the crown the lesser the chance of things auch as “if the owner forgot to screw the crown back in tightly after winding or if the crown threads and seals wore out over time, then dust and water could still enter.” So it was Rolex covering all bases along with the main preventative measures a sealed/screw down crown and case.
    I dont think Rolex were being so literal, my take would be that “Oyster” is a term implying a sealed case/water resistance and coined by Rolex to help market the watch.

  • Biffo10

    Hi Matt
    I think if you read the piece again, that’s exactly what was stated  lol !

    “Because although the Oyster case was impermeable to dust and water, if the owner forgot to screw the crown back in tightly after winding or if the crown threads and seals wore out over time, then dust and water could still enter, a self-winding movement solved this problem.”

    ‘addressed, minimised, but certainly not ‘solved ‘, & certainly not by the creation of an automatic movement.
    Let’s face it, water only needs to get into the case once to cause problems, & that can happen on day 1 or 31
    manual or automatic.

    Take your point about not taking anything literally from the lips of Rolex ha ha

    Im still trying to fathom …” it takes a year to make a movemet”   Hmmn…
    So 1,000,000 watches produced annually, produced by 8,000 employees ( & robots ) = 1,000,000 years of work !??
    Strange, Rolex have refused to substantiate the claim. Maybe Rolexspeek ( or b*******t ) should be added to Oxford dictionary  lol !

  • Pingback: The Seiko 6139 - 600X Collectors Guide - The Springbar()

  • Pingback: Why Monopusher Chronographs Are Primitive & A Brief History Of The Chronograph Watch Complication | aBlogtoWatch()