back to top

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Baselworld 2015: The release of the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept watch could put the watchmaking industry on a new path. We’re in an era of change. Advancements in wearable technology are coming thick and fast. This is in stark contrast to the often glacial progress of horology en masse. For most of the 20th century, game-changing inventions were massive and infrequent. Nowadays, infinitesimal improvements seem to be happening all the time. Rare indeed is an addition that adds an entirely new and practical function to a watch – but the question is whether or not consumers want it there.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Working in conjunction with WISeKey, a Swiss NFC technology expert, Bulgari have created something that is more than just a self-winding mechanical watch. It is a key to a portable vault worn on the wrist. Inside the case, which is attractive regardless of its internal intrigue, is an NFC chip capable of unlocking an application that can store huge amounts of encrypted data on the cloud and communicate with other devices within its range. By simply tapping the watch against a smart device, it is possible to engage the specially designed app from which the watch’s data storage potential can be controlled.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Bulgari make a big deal about the security of this watch, so it’s important to point out that your data isn’t actually stored on the watch. Rather, the watch has a direct link-up to an underground bunker in the Swiss Alps, where all your passwords, PINs, personal information and bank details can be stored. I know it sounds like something out of a James Bond movie, but seriously – this is one vision of the future that could soon become a reality. But is it the most likely?

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

The Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept forces us to ask questions about the future of haute horlogerie. The integration of new, non-mechanical technologies into luxury watches moves the goalposts somewhat. Coinciding with the dawn of the smart watch age are hybrid luxury watches such as the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept and the Breitling B55 Connected, a compromise that might perpetuate high-end horology’s relevance in an increasingly interactive world, or are they a desperate prelude to an approaching death knell? Wearing the watch on the wrist, one might argue, “this is cool but now I have to wear the same watch all the time. Would this technology be better used in a Bulgari bracelet instead?”

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

It is imperative to identify where the appeal of a luxury watch comes from. We already know that mechanical timepieces are far from the most efficient way to tell the time. We have phones; we have laptops; we may even have an MP3 player that is more accurate than a $100,000 Patek. But we still want the wristwatch because it has a soul. It is a reminder of human endeavor and skill. It is a treasure and a status symbol. It is beautiful in a way the concealed calculations of a circuit-board will never be. Agreeing to let these electronic invaders come into contact with a finely wrought mechanical movement is heresy, right?

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Well, toeing that line might feel a little hypocritical, if you’ve ever lusted over a luxury quartz watch. I certainly have. I even used one in my previous example: the Breitling B55 Connected is a luxury quartz watch that connects to your smart phone using similar, if not identical technology to the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept. There are plenty of purists who dismiss quartz as it is. I’ve never been that strict on the matter, because I tend to care more about what the watch stands for. That said, there comes a point when even I believe a line should be drawn.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

So what is that line, and where do I think we should draw it? It seems obvious that smart watches and other wearable technologies are the future. I don’t believe that a smart watch is a direct replacement for a mechanical wristwatch, because they perform different functions (one is for the display and processing of information; the other is an item of personality). Regrettably, though, they occupy the same territory, so you can only wear one at a time.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

The truth is, a mechanical watch will never be able to house as much functionality as a pure smart watch. So should we even bother with these half-way houses? One option would be for haute horlogerie to go in the other direction entirely and consolidate the ways of old, to reject everything non-mechanical (even quartz), to batten down the hatches and prepare for war. But is it a war the traditional wristwatch can win if it eschews modernity? Let’s just say I’m not rushing out to buy confetti and streamers…

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

But there is hope for high-end watchmaking. We might see years of attrition, we might see a settled-upon compromise that floods the market and becomes the norm, or – and I kind of like this idea – we might return our mechanical marvels to the pocket and leave the wrist free for the fad of the future.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

So where does this release fit into this new smart world? I believe that watches in the mould of the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept are a bridge. We could be in for a few years of watches designed in this vein while the major maisons decide which track they want to tread. In that light, the technology housed in the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept provides fascinating possibilities that we should fully embrace while the jury remains out. This model is not only a trailblazer, but also a beautiful watch that deserves praise and attention for the way it honors the brand’s stylistic values but keeps things current with a bi-color, multi-material case and rubber strap and that oh-so-cool Bulgari bezel.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

The ‘Magnesium’ in the title comes from the case middle material. Light and strong, magnesium is uncommon in watchmaking, but incredibly well suited to the rigours of a wristwatch. That beautiful bezel is crafted from ceramic this time around – a great choice to reduce wear and glare. There is also a ceramic ‘cap’ on the crown (which, along with the case back, is PVD-coated steel). The final material worth mentioning is PEEK, a revolutionary, space-grade polymer that is so highly regarded in terms of temperature resistance and structural resilience it has been used instead of metal in Space Shuttle design. PEEK stands for PolyEtherEtherKetone, which is neither as catchy nor as cute as its acronymic title. PEEK is also used for the buckle that fastens the vulcanized rubber strap to your wrist.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

Without the NFC chip, the watch is available in four colours – blue, silver/gray, bronze, and anthracite. If you go for the Concept, though, it is only available in bronze for now. The dials match the color and finish of the case, which kind of looks like rough-sandblasting but is a feature of the Motor-Lac coating that gives the cases a distinctive hue, texture, and sheen. Bulgari’s engineers have been pretty creative here, and borrowed the idea from the coating used to protect the complicated functional components of motor cars, hence the name.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

But let’s focus on what this concept from Bulgari can offer you that other watches can not. The Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept is referred to as an “Intelligent Watch.” It doesn’t make decisions for you, but it does aim to streamline your life in an intelligent fashion, removing the clutter necessary to get through your day. Theoretically, the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept watch could be a set of keys for your home, safe and car; it could be your plane ticket, boarding pass and passport; it could be your debit card, your check-book and your credit history all at once. More so, the security of the concept is limited to who has access to your watch, as well as how much stock you want to put into the durability of the application that Bulgari has designed the concept around.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

This all sounds well and good, but that’s a lot of sensitive data to carry around on your wrist! To put minds at ease, Bulgari remind us that this is a purely Swiss timepiece in the hope that is enough to allay our fears of fraud. Swiss company WISeKey do have plenty of experience in the field of data storage, though, and are already set-up with Android and iOS apps for securely storing passwords and credit cards, so their track record is reassuring.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

So how do you go about accessing and entering the information protected by your watch? By connecting to your smartphone or tablet via an NFC (Near Field Communication) interface, you can use the Bulgari Vault App to manage your details. Remember, the data you enter through your phone is not stored on your phone. It is encrypted and then buried in your underground bunker potentially thousands of miles away. It is a really neat tool, and certainly has some patently practical uses. But it remains to be seen how seamlessly it will function in the real world. Right now, this watch is still in development. The concept has been revealed now, possibly to gauge opinion and work out any bugs in the machine before they go to market with their prospective pioneer.

Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept Watch Hands-On Hands-On

One factor that may determine the success of of the Bulgari Diagono Magnesium Concept is the price. When I first saw this watch and read about its function, I immediately imagined the price tag would knock my socks off. But then I discovered that the price with or without the NFC chip is $4,600. I was very pleasantly surprised. Whether this excites you, as it did me, may well depend on how you feel about the marketing values of this watch. Very little is made of the self-winding mechanical movement that powers the watch (operating at 28,800 vph and boasting a power reserve of 42 hours) and gives it its soul. Instead, all the attention is given to the watch’s intelligence. Time will tell how smart an idea that was.



Disqus Debug thread_id: 3991168161

  • 5803822

    Assuming all the tech stuff could me managed via cell phone – why bother funneling it throgh a watch ? On it’s own quite an attractive two hander  stand alone mechanical —  with ????? movement ??

  • IanE

    And what if it gets stolen [with all your lovely data]?

  • Zeitblom

    Magnesium is certainly amazingly light, though why that is a good thing on something as small as a wristwatch continues to escape me. Anyway, it is also extremely soft and easy to scratch, though that doesn’t seem to bother the titanium fans. Magnesium is also highly flammable, so if you are lost in the forest you can scrape some chips off this thing and start a fire… They can get back to me when they start making watches out of tungsten. Rhenium would be good too.

  • thornwood36

    Here is a classic example of inventing something that didn’t need inventing, and the face cover is a horrible colour ( I’ll use the proper spelling : ) )

  • bnabod

    Forget the tech on this one. I don’t need a shark w a frikkin laser beam on its head either but the watch itself is actually quite nice. The dial that continues on beyond the dial onto the strap is not a bad idea (except I am not sure what it is made off kind of looks like plastic). So overall a nice effort.

  • DangerussArt

    VSELESS. Encryption of cloud based data and NFC is nothing new. This is a $10 iTunes app (or should be). Give Apple Watch Developers 5 minutes and you’ll have a dozen flavors of this tech. I must be hungry, since this looks like a cookie on a strap to me.

  • dimatha

    I prefer Magnesium 250mg Tabs for muscle relaxation  🙂

  • Lkcons


  • “We already know that mechanical timepieces are far from the most efficient way to tell the time. We have phones; we have laptops; we may even have an MP3 player that is more accurate than a $100,000 Patek.”
    Are you trying to argue efficiency, or accuracy? Maybe I’m just a luddite, but I can check the time much more efficiently by glancing at my wrist than by digging out my phone, powering up my laptop, or referencing my… mp3 player? Who the hell still carries around an mp3 player.
    And if you did mean to take a stab at accuracy and not efficiency, then I’ll bore you with the same tedious but appropriate argument that mechanical watches are generally not bought for accuracy first. Yes, they need to be accurate, but I have never in my life met someone that truly needed seconds-a-day (or month or year) accuracy. Lots of people that want it, sure, but that truly need it? No. So promoting this hideous watch as some kind of savior to all of us watch nerds that have been lamenting the lack of an NFC watch that actually tells accurate time is ridiculous. Mechanical watches are as much about emotion as they are function, and this influx of ‘smart’ devices are deciding to completely discount that.

  • Feller87

    5803822 that is why mechanical watches will remain viable since anything they can make a watch do the phone itself can do it better, apple watch being the prime example

  • I_G

    “the watch has a direct link-up to an underground bunker in the Swiss Alps, where all your passwords, PINs, personal information and bank details can be stored”
    This must be one of the biggest marketing bullshit I’ve ever read.

  • Ulysses31

    The bronze one looks more like it was made from glued-together sawdust.  Really ugly.  The blue one is more acceptable visually, although that “beautiful” ceramic bezel is ugly as hell with the trademark “BVLGARI” lettering.  It might as well say “THUGLIFE” or “LOVEHATE” on it.  Really tacky, spoils the look.  Here’s a suggestion – why not put all that smart shit into a cuff-link?  That way you can wear whatever shirt or watch you like and nobody will even know you are wearing something worth stealing.  Discreet too.  Somebody has probably already made something like that.  The price is extreme when you consider pencil sharpeners are also made of magnesium.  Maybe that fancy plastic is what jacks up the price?  It sure can’t be the electronics, which are so easy to mass-produce they become practically worthless (relatively speaking).  $4600 for Swatch-like looks, I think i’ll pass.

  • DG Cayse

    Ah, so this is available w/out the NFC chip. I like the looks of the watch. Don’t care much for the materials it is made with.
    I’d like to see an MSDS on this in contact with human skin over a long term period of time.
    And, what is the size and weight of this piece?
    What was the caliber again? I seem to have missed that.
    And about that “underground Swiss bunker” thing…?

  • DG Cayse

    thornwood36You would be using that British spelling being as you are a Glaswegian Lad. My family was Sooth Lanrikshire, (Siorrachd Lannraig a Deas,). But so many years ago they were free from that Brit corruption.

  • bnabod

    DG Cayse it is an underground lair 😉

  • Jimxxx

    Wake me up when there is a real watch review….

  • Evitzee

    Another answer to a question nobody asked.  The young guns who write for ABTW don’t have the history of horology and certainly weren’t even around in the early 80’s when the Swiss tried to go head to head with the Japanese.  The Swiss watch industry is built on tradition and hand craftsmanship.  If they want to now try to compete with the Apples of the world they will reap what they sow.  They need to stick to what they do best….mechanical timepieces.  Anything else is just foolish and a waste of money.

  • I_G

    Lkcons No! it’s VVLGARI

  • bichondaddy

    Just another case of:  Just because you can build it, doesn’t mean you should!

  • phsjacob

    A “game-changing improvement”, a “new and practical function” that the industry actually SHOULD embrace is the self-contained atomic movement used in watches like the Hoptroff atomic watches. If that technology was combined with a photovoltaic cell or an electricity-generating rotor to eliminate the need for charging, THAT would be an exciting direction for watches. Even further development of solar quartz or autoquartz watches would be great. There are a lot of beautiful and great watches out there, but there are very few that combine good looks, high accuracy, and long-term dependability.

  • IWC wants their Ingenieur back. I thought I liked the bronze color (American spelling – thank you Daniel Webster) until I saw it on a wrist. Then it looks too flesh like for my taste.
    NFC – where to start. Good idea, sure but having crypto keys on it only means that this is like not having your house key. Lost is inconvenient but stolen is far worse. Until the watch or phone app requires a second factor of security (like a PIN) then this is just a great prize for thieves. If this is a $4600 mechanical watch (with an NFC chip), then good on Bulgari. But as a quartz watch with an NFC watch it is overpriced. Once again you are paying for THE NAME, THE NAME.
    If if only has an NFC chip then I don’t get the photo with what I assume is a charger – this simple device should be solar powered like a decent Tissot. Or better yet, not powered at (like the NFC chips on some credit cards). Your phone will be the NFC reader, right?

  • somethingnottaken

    Why would I want to combine an electronic gizmo that will be obsolete within a few years with a luxury watch (whether mechanical or quartz) that I expect to last for many decades? Electronics built into a strap makes sense – staps are less expensive and will wear out over several years of regular use so their usable life is closer to that of the electronics. Separate devices on a common strap or bracelet makes even more sense as the electronics could be replaced independantly of the other parts.

  • somethingnottaken

    Ulysses31 Smart cuff links would make alot of sense.

  • somethingnottaken

    Zeitblom Osmium Oxide is toxic, so how about Iridium? Ruthenium would be another interesting option.

  • Jason Dunn

    Magnesium is extremely vulnerable to acids, even weak ones. It’s also not terribly hard, so has roughly the same drawbacks as aluminum as a watch material. Is the magnesium in this coated or otherwise isolated from the environment?