back to top

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Dress watches are a breed of their own, often avoided by bloggers and enthusiasts because of their delicate balance of clean and boring. I often find myself in a suit, so I’m always looking for a solid dress watch to complete the ensemble. One of the more interesting dress watches of the year came from Frederique Constant. I’ve been drawn to the brand for a while. They have done some creative things in their short time on the scene, and the Classic Moonphase Manufacture — a simple dress watch that features an in-house movement, at a fair price — is a case in point.

Before we get to the watch, I want to highlight why I find the brand so appealing. About 15 years ago, Frederique Constant looked to set itself apart from the competition (because let’s be honest, the brand is in a pretty saturated space) by starting to manufacture movements in-house. This allowed them to be a little more creative and offer a better-value product than many other brands in the same price bracket. Because of this approach, they aren’t limited to heavily modifying a Sellita or ETA to achieve the desired features. The decision created a slew of interesting models, including a Flyback Chronograph and a Worldtimer that both come in at less than $5,000 — a very competitive offering.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Classic Moonphase Manufacture Case

The stainless steel case measures in at 42mm but is relatively thick for a dressier style watch. I don’t necessarily mind the design, but I did find a few irritants about the size and flow of the case. First, the bezel is thick, significantly rounded, and tall. I imagine the dramatic taper off the sides is intended to help the watch slide under a cuff better. However, I found the case thick enough to consistently catch on my sleeves, no matter which wrist I wore it on (eliminating the large onion crown as the culprit). Maybe I wear my sleeves too tight, but I do feel the design of the case was certainly unforgiving.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

The convex sapphire crystal butts up nicely to the bezel and gives the watch a uniform aesthetic. On the wrist, it looks attractive. The lugs extend straight from the case and feature a clean taper that makes the watch very comfortable. They offset some of the thickness by sitting nicely against the wrist. I wasn’t constantly pulling the watch back to the center of my wrist, as I would have expected with a thicker watch with larger lugs (ah-la Chronoswiss). A flat sapphire crystal fits to the back, so the in-house movement is fully on display. The 5 ATM water resistance was a nice step up from the typical 3 ATM of many dress watches, though I still avoided the water.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Overall, I felt the case was a bit of an odd design choice. I recognize that other watches in the Frederique Constant catalog have similar cases, but on the Moonphase Manufacture, it feels a lot more round than it needed to be. I think lowering the size to 39mm or 40mm, with a thinner bezel, would have suited the watch a lot more — similar to the brand’s Slimline collection. For a dress watch, it felt unnecessarily large, thick, and wasn’t the easiest watch to slide under a dress shirt cuff.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Classic Moonphase Manufacture Dial

Moving onto the dial, and my favorite part of the watch: it’s coherent. This spawns from the desire to split the single sub-dial display of the Classic Manufacture Moonphase (see what they did there?) into two separate displays. And to that end, it’s a beautiful design that I feel simply works.

For the dial, Frederique Constant combined design features that have worked in previous models. For one, the elongated white Roman numerals are both legible and aesthetically easy on the eyes. They pop against the sunburst blue dial and don’t distract from the rest of the watch’s feature sets. The date subdial at 9 o’clock feels just large enough to be effective and recessed enough to be elegant. The moonphase at 3 o’clock matches well with the dial and, in this model, the moon has been made white as to not distract from the overall blue and white color scheme — a feature I really appreciate. The finishing on the moonphase is slick but has matte stars and moon, really helping the display “pop” out from its matching subdial.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

The handset is clean, with simple sword hands with a glossy white finish. They are difficult to lose in the dial and contrast nicely against the Roman numerals. I never have a hard time picking out the time at a glance. Overall, there is a large margin of error when creating a dress watch with multiple complications, and I feel like Frederique Constant nailed the dial.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Classic Moonphase Manufacture Movement

Flipping the watch over, you’ll find the gorgeous FC-712. This is Frederique Constant’s 29th in-house caliber, and a serious value. The decoration is superb. The center plate features circular Geneva striping that I found more pronounced than in many movements I’ve handled. The striping is deep and catches the light nicely. Beneath, Perlage covers the entire length of the main plate. The hollowed-out gilded rotor doesn’t obstruct the view of the movement — a feature I greatly appreciate.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Designed around the FC-700 series, the FC-712 splits the date and moonphase into two separate complications. This took the brand two years to achieve. The automatic movement features a power reserve of 38 hours and ticks at a smooth 28,800 VpH.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

Classic Moonphase Manufacture Strap

The Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture comes on a blue alligator leather strap with a simple deployant clasp (that I came around to). I was concerned, from the press images, that the blue would be a bit much, but it wasn’t. Luckily, it tied nicely into the watch. The strap features a full belly lining that was incredibly comfortable, though, in a suit for a long period of time, I noticed it did flex when moisture from sweat got in it. This is a normal phenomenon, but I found, when paired with the thickness, it could get uncomfortable under a sleeve.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews

One thing that’s important to note is that my strap clicked at the lugs quite often — usually, due to pulling on the spring bar and grinding against the lug. In my case, I believe that the strap sat too loose on the spring bar, and it rattled against the case when bending or twisting the wrist. Possibly a fluke or an older, stretched-out strap, but important to note when considering it at the boutique.

Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase Manufacture Watch Review Wrist Time Reviews


Overall, I enjoyed my time with the Classic Moonphase Manufacture. Unfortunately, this watch simply didn’t fit my criteria for a dress watch, as much as I wanted it to. I found the watch well-built and easy on the eyes. However, it’s simply too bulky to wear with dress clothes. Making this 2-3mm smaller, and a few millimeters thinner, seems like a missed opportunity. I feel it would make the watch immensely more wearable with a cuff. I don’t fault the brand for trying something outside the box, and I have no doubt this watch will find buyers who won’t mind the footprint. Price for the Frederique Constant Classic Moonphase is $2,595 in stainless steel. They do have a rose-gold plated option available for $300 more. Read more about this watch at

Read more about

Watch Brands



Disqus Debug thread_id: 7625929512

  • Well, I’ll be damned????At a glance, the FC C Moonphase M does look like a Seiko Presage Blue Shippo Enamel SPB073

  • Alex A

    Surprisingly reasonable price for a nice looking watch.

  • Jared

    shows you just how important brand positioning is with luxury goods

    an in house movement and not just an automatic but with a moonphase to boot, selling for $2,600

    if this exact watch had a different name on the dial, and I’m not even talking Patek, if it was Perriwinkle or Mr.Bean Watches it would have been a $25,000 watch(maybe with an extra $500 worth of finishing), but because FC as a brand just doesn’t have the brand value as a luxury product, you get this price.

    It reminds me of that Oris release last week…it was really next level shit, but because it had Oris on the dial, everyone was instantly talking about how they’d never pay this much money for an Oris

  • cluedog12

    Looks like a dress watch, wears like a business casual watch. Classic, not sexy. Very good value.

  • SuperStrapper

    A really nice hands on review.
    FC is a brand I wish I liked more. How this article started, detailing why you enjoy the brand; I feel much the same way. However, despite how neat they sound on part I almost always have a problem with how they execute finished watches. This one is a fine example.
    At the risk of sounding unnecessarily inflammatory, there is little I’m enjoying about this watch. The case is not nice. Travis you did a good job of getting that across without digging away at the brand but I’ll suggest they need to spend more time considering case shapes in general.
    The shade of blue used on the dial is nice, and ends up being my favourite part. The typefaces used are stale and uninspired, the moonphase disk has no personality, and I don’t support this handset. While I can see it is well done, and with a glossy finish as reviewed, white painted watch hands are almost always a mistake, certainly on a watch in this style. They absolutley should be metal, and if polished metal hands result in a downtick on the legibility scale, so be it: this isn’t some at-a-glace tool watch and the style decision here I just think was a mistake. The style of the roman numerals is fine but how flat they look is a letdown. I feel like the dial could have been saved a bit if they were more prominent/slightly raised.
    The movement is nice, I agree the caliber looks great, especially considering the price point. You can identify some slightly off finishes on close inspection but no real complaints on its appearance:

    In terms of function, I like the layout offered here. For a homegrown movement in today’s modern watch world, especially if you’ll be presenting it in a case this size, a power reserve of 3 days or more would have been nice.

    I could see this as a very interesting watch with a few updates, most noteworthy being the case and handsets. Imaging a contrasting dial: the outer ring that holds the roman numerals raised up a step from the inner circle containing the verbiage, and with a seperate texture and colour.

    • Independent_George

      Nice review by Travis, and a very well thought out comment by SS. Kudos to both of you.

      • Travis Cannata

        Thanks man!

  • Mikita

    FC watches have everything – value proposition, attractive case finishing, manufacture movements, etc. etc. – except personality. Too safe, too derivative from “big brothers” (aka Patek etc). I liked their more unique lines like Heart Beat Manufacture and Healey, but it looks like they are trying to play safe today.

  • Sheez Gagoo

    When you buy a microfibertowel and a bottle of Zippo lighterfluid, you could get rid of all these fingerprints on the case without scratching it.

    • Larry Holmack

      A microfiber cloth and some Brillianize works just as well…and you don’t have about your kids trying to light their toy airplanes on fire!! ?? I use it to keep my watches looking nice!!!

  • Ron Crocker

    Somewhat attractive piece and I think a pretty good value, however I’ll never understand the moonphase complication unless you’re a vampire.

    • disqus_jTudukIYpJ

      You mean werewolf?

  • Lurch

    A roman numeral watch is like a two tone watch.

  • Larry Holmack

    I quite like it. I didn’t see the need to fuss over it being 42 mm’s…and worrying that it won’t fit under a long sleeve dress shirt’s cuff. I seem to be able to wear a 47 mm watch and have it fit quite nicely under my long sleeve dress shirts and my suit jacket.
    Sometimes, I invision some of y’all, carrying a caliper in your back pocket and going around at a company outing and whip it out to measure everyone’s watch.
    I mean…has anyone ever done a blind size test to see if they can blindly tell a 40 mm from a 41 mm case not looking at them side by side? I mean 1 mm is mighty small…
    Just the kind of random stuff I think about…and again…I like it.

  • Raymond Wilkie

    My favourite complication as dull as dish water, that’s just lazy. ( moon phase)

  • Dan F

    I think that Frederic Constant doesn’t quite get the press they deserve, and that your coverage of this watch is spot on! I currently own the FC slim line with a similar movement, and have owned several FC’s over the years. I would like to add a few things I’ve learned about FC for readers considering the brand. FC does the impossible, and makes a fine watch assembled in Geneva also with an in-house movement made in Geneva, available for a song. And this new moon phase is even lower priced that the last! Consider that there are very few manufacturers making their watches in Geneva, and fewer still make the movements there. This puts FC in the very rare company of Patek Phillipe, Roger Dubois and smaller boutique brands like F.P. Journe. Brands like Vacheron Constantin and Chopard may assemble watches and movements there, but the movement parts come from elsewhere. And Rolex doesn’t even assemble their movements in Geneva. But FC makes the major parts of the movement right there in a beautiful factory across from Piaget, and assemble them there too. Even their Sellita-based watches are cased up in Geneva. While similar watches from Geneva-Based Raymond Weil and Baume & Mercier are not known to actually be produced there. Now, at this price there are a few concessions to be made. Judging from the watch price, and the size of the factory, very likely the cases are Hong Kong made. Even if true, they still look high quality. Also, the FC-710 movement is very large. Although that is a trend of many new movements, it does make the watch case quite large for dress models. I had three early models of the movement, and had problems with all of them. I assume that the issues have since been worked out. The only other in-house movement in this price range comes from Baume Mercier in their Baumatic. The design of that movement actually looks similar in many respects, so maybe they copied the FC. However, the BM doesn’t look as nicely finished. It is Richemont’s entry level movement and a variant also appears in Cartier models. It was designed by Val Fluerier, whose movement’s I don’t find particularly earthshaking. While B&M may be an older, more respected brand than FC, I find FC’s designs more authentic, and better emulating of upscale models like Patek Phillipe.

  • Drop files here or
    Accepted file types: jpg, png.